
Navigating Ontario's New Parenting Laws
Legal Strategy reviewed by Deepa Tailor, Senior Family Lawyer. Updated January 2026 to reflect the Divorce Act and Children's Law Reform Act (CLRA) amendments.
Old Term: "Custody" → New Term: "Decision-Making Responsibility" (Who makes the big choices on health/school/religion).
Old Term: "Access" → New Term: "Parenting Time" (The schedule of when the child is with you).
The Rule: There is NO presumption of 50/50 time. The only test is the "Best Interests of the Child."
For decades, the law treated children like property to be "won." Parents fought for "custody" as if it were a trophy. The language was adversarial, the outcomes binary: one parent "won," the other "lost."
The new laws change that. We don't fight for "custody"; we fight for a parenting plan that works.
"The shift from 'custody' to 'decision-making responsibility' isn't just semantic. It's a fundamental reframing: children aren't possessions to be divided. They're people who need stability, safety, and a relationship with both parents (when safe to do so)."
— Deepa Tailor, Senior Family Lawyer
This page will walk you through Ontario's modern parenting framework: what the terms mean, how decisions are made, and how to draft an order that protects your relationship with your child.
Ontario's Divorce Act (federal) and Children's Law Reform Act (provincial) were amended to replace outdated, adversarial terminology with child-focused language.
Old: Custody
The authority to make significant decisions about the child's health, education, culture, language, religion, and significant extra-curricular activities.
Old: Access
The time a child spends in the care of a parent, including overnights, weekends, holidays, and day-to-day care.
Old: Visitation
Time spent with the child by someone other than a parent (e.g., grandparents, extended family). Does not include decision-making authority.
Why the change? The old terms implied ownership and conflict. The new terms focus on the child's needs and parental responsibilities, not parental rights.
When it comes to major decisions about your child's life, Ontario law recognizes three models. The right model depends on your ability to communicate, the history of care, and whether there's been family violence.
| Model | How It Works | Best For | Risk |
|---|---|---|---|
Joint Decision-Making | Both parents must consult and agree on major decisions (health, education, religion, extracurriculars). | Low-conflict parents who can communicate effectively and compromise. | Deadlock. If you can't agree, you're back in court for every decision. |
Sole Decision-Making | One parent has final authority to make all major decisions (may still consult, but not required to agree). | High-conflict cases, family violence, or where one parent has been the primary caregiver. | The other parent may feel excluded or resentful, potentially leading to alienation claims. |
Parallel Decision-MakingDISRUPTOR | Decision-making is divided by domain. Example: Mom decides Health; Dad decides Education. No consultation required. | High-conflict families where both parents are capable but cannot cooperate. | Requires clear boundaries. Overlap areas (e.g., "Is therapy health or education?") must be defined. |
Parallel Decision-Making is underutilized but highly effective for high-conflict families. It allows both parents to remain involved without the constant friction of joint consultation. We help families structure parallel plans that reduce conflict while protecting both parents' roles.
Every parenting decision in Ontario is governed by a single principle: What is in the Best Interests of the Child? This isn't about what's fair to the parents. It's about what's best for the child.
The court considers a non-exhaustive list of factors. Here are the most important:
Is the child safe from harm, abuse, or neglect? Courts prioritize safety above all else.
Who has been the primary caregiver? Who takes the child to appointments, helps with homework, manages daily routines?
Can each parent provide a stable home, emotional support, and meet the child's developmental needs?
Older children's wishes are considered (with more weight given to teenagers), but they don't get to "decide."
Courts try to keep siblings together and maintain important family relationships (grandparents, etc.).
The "Friendly Parent" rule: Courts favor the parent who encourages a relationship with the other side (unless safety is an issue).
Any history of violence, coercive control, or abuse is a primary consideration. This includes violence witnessed by the child.
The child's heritage and identity are protected. Courts consider continuity in cultural practices.
Courts look favorably on the parent who encourages a relationship with the other parent. If you're seen as obstructing access, making false allegations, or alienating the child, it can seriously damage your case. Cooperation (when safe) is strategic.
There is no presumption of 50/50 parenting time in Ontario. The schedule must be based on the Best Interests of the Child. Here are the most common arrangements:
How it works: Child alternates full weeks with each parent. Requires minimal exchanges.
Best for: Parents who live close to each other and the child's school. Works well for older children.
How it works: Mon-Tue with Parent A, Wed-Thu with Parent B, Fri-Sun alternates. More frequent exchanges.
Best for: Younger children who need more frequent contact with both parents.
How it works: Parent A: Mon-Tue (every week) + every other Fri-Sun. Parent B: Wed-Thu (every week) + alternating Fri-Sun.
Best for: Provides consistency (same weekdays) while maintaining equal time.
How it works: Child lives primarily with one parent. Other parent has alternating weekends + one weeknight.
Best for: When one parent has been the primary caregiver or parents live far apart.
How it works: Tailored schedule based on work schedules, school, extracurriculars, and the child's needs.
Best for: Families with unique circumstances (shift work, travel, special needs).
Important: "Shared Parenting" (where each parent has the child at least 40% of the time) affects child support calculations but doesn't eliminate the obligation.
The Federal Child Support Guidelines use a "set-off" method or consider the condition, means, needs, and other circumstances of each parent.
Includes: Editable templates, sample clauses, and a step-by-step guide to drafting your parenting plan.
Download our Parenting Plan Checklist and get clarity on decision-making, schedules, and how to protect your relationship with your child.
Not all conflict is equal. There's a critical difference between high conflict (two people arguing) and family violence (one person dominating, controlling, or harming the other).
Definition: Both parents engage in ongoing disputes, poor communication, and difficulty cooperating. Neither is necessarily "at fault."
Solutions:
Definition: Physical, sexual, psychological, or financial abuse. Includes coercive control, threats, and violence witnessed by the child.
Legal Consequences:
What it is: When one parent systematically undermines the child's relationship with the other parent through manipulation, false allegations, or interference.
Signs of Alienation:
Court Remedies: Therapy (reunification counseling), changes to decision-making responsibility, or even a change in primary residence in severe cases. Courts take alienation seriously because it harms the child.
If safety is at risk: If you or your child are in danger, or if the Children's Aid Society (CAS) is involved, you need immediate legal advice.Learn about CAS defense strategies.
A vague parenting order is a recipe for endless conflict. "Reasonable access" means nothing when parents disagree on what's "reasonable." We draft parenting plans that cover every detail.
We've seen parents return to court dozens of times because their original order said things like "reasonable notice" or "as agreed between the parties." When you can't agree, you're back in front of a judge. Detailed orders create peace. Vague orders create conflict.
We help parents create detailed, enforceable parenting plans that protect your relationship with your child and reduce conflict.
Understand your rights under the new parenting laws
Draft parenting plans that prevent future conflict
Experienced advocacy in high-conflict cases

Deepa Tailor is a Senior Family Lawyer specializing in Ontario divorce proceedings, complex property division, and high-stakes custody disputes. She provides strategic, results-driven advocacy to help clients protect their assets and secure their children's future, whether through amicable negotiation or vigorous courtroom representation.
View Full Bio