
Custody is out. Decision-Making is in. Understanding the massive shift in terminology and the new focus on Family Violence in Ontario law.
Legal Analysis: This insights guide was reviewed by Deepa Tailor, Senior Family Lawyer, to explain the practical impact of the 'Bill 207' amendments to the CLRA (2026).
The updated Children's Law Reform Act (CLRA) fundamentally changes how we talk about parenting. The courts have abandoned 'Win/Lose' language like 'Custody' and 'Access' to reduce conflict. The law now speaks of 'Parenting Time' and 'Decision-Making Responsibility.' Crucially, the Act now includes a comprehensive definition of Family Violence, mandating that courts consider physical, sexual, and psychological abuse when deciding a child's future.
Eliminating 'Custody' and 'Access.' These terms were seen as treating children like property. New terms focus on the responsibilities of the parent, not their rights.
Violence is no longer just physical. The Act now explicitly recognizes Coercive Control, financial abuse, and psychological harm as factors that limit a parent's ability to care for a child.
The Act reinforces that a child should have as much time with each parent as is consistent with their Best Interests—but safety now trumps contact.
New, strict frameworks for moving with a child. A parent planning to move must give 60 days' notice, and the burden of proof shifts depending on the existing schedule.
Using old terms in your affidavit can make you look outdated.
Courts must now consider all forms of violence when assessing a parent's capacity:
Direct harm or the threat of harm to the child or the other parent.
A pattern of behavior designed to isolate, intimidate, or control the other parent (e.g., taking their phone, controlling finances).
Directly exposing the child to the abuse (e.g., yelling at the other parent while the child watches).
Does the violence cause the other parent to fear for their safety? If one parent is living in fear, they cannot co-parent effectively.
No. Parenting Time is just the name for the schedule. The actual split (50/50, 60/40, or weekends) is still determined by the 'Best Interests of the Child' test.
Evidence is key. Courts now look at text messages, emails, and financial records to establish patterns of control, not just physical bruises.
Yes. The CLRA specifically lists 'Contact Orders' for non-parents, allowing grandparents to apply for time if it is in the child's best interests.
Comprehensive overview of the Children's Law Reform Act and its jurisdiction
Learn MoreUnderstanding mothers' rights and primary caregiver considerations
Learn MoreExploring fathers' rights and the maximum contact principle
Learn More
Senior Family Lawyer
Deepa Tailor is the founder of Tailor Law. She educates parents on the nuances of the Children's Law Reform Act, ensuring their legal strategy aligns with the modern focus on safety and child-centric terminology.
View Full BioEnsure your legal strategy aligns with the modern Children's Law Reform Act and the new focus on child-centric terminology.
Book Your CLRA Strategy Session