It is the "Nuclear Option" of family law. Learn why proving Contempt requires a criminal standard of proof and what happens if you succeed.
Legal Review: Reviewed by Deepa Tailor, to ensure alignment with the Family Law Rules regarding Rule 31 (Contempt).
You cannot find someone in contempt just because they were late. To win a Contempt Motion, you must prove three specific things:
The original Court Order must be unambiguous. If it says 'reasonable access' instead of 'Every Saturday at 10 AM,' contempt will likely fail because the term is vague.
You must prove the other parent actually received the order. This is why strict 'Affidavits of Service' are required.
You must prove they broke the rule on purpose. An honest mistake, a flat tire, or a sick child is usually a valid defense.
Myth: "He didn't bring the kids back, so I'll call the police to go arrest him."
Reality: Police generally will NOT intervene in custody disputes unless the Court Order has a specific 'Police Enforcement Clause' (which is rare). Usually, they will tell you to 'take it back to family court'—which means filing a Contempt Motion.
Because the burden of proof is so high, you need detailed evidence. Start collecting:
A written diary of every missed visit, exact times, and excuses given.
Text messages or emails where the other parent explicitly refuses the visit (e.g., "I'm not bringing them back").
Proof that they were served with the original order.
If they claimed the child was sick, did they provide a doctor's note? If not, note it.
Judges prefer "remedial" penalties first (e.g., giving you make-up time). If the behavior continues, they may issue fines ($1,000+ per day) or order the offender to pay 100% of your legal costs. Jail is the last resort.
Contempt motions are technically complex and strict. We can help you draft the materials to meet the 'Beyond Reasonable Doubt' standard.
Book an Enforcement Strategy Session
Senior Family Lawyer & Founder
Deepa Tailor is a Senior Family Lawyer specializing in Ontario divorce proceedings, complex property division, and high-stakes custody disputes. She provides strategic, results-driven advocacy to help clients protect their assets and secure their children's future, whether through amicable negotiation or vigorous courtroom representation.
View Full Bio